Letteratura scientifica

Abstract

 

Background: Surface modifications to dental implants have been used in an attempt to accelerate the osseointegration process. The objective of this study was to biomechanically/histomorphometrically evaluate a bioceramic grit-blasted and acid-etched surface (BGB/AA;test) versus a dual acid-etched implant surface (control) in a beagle dog model.

 

Methods: Control and BGB/AA implants were subjected to a series of physicochemical characterization tools, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and auger photoelectron spectroscopy (APS). The animal model included the placement of 72 implants along the proximal tibiae of six beagle dogs, which remained in place for 2 or 4 weeks. After euthanization, half of the specimens were biomechanically tested (removal torque), and the other half was non-decalcified processed to slides of ;30 mm thickness for histomorphologic and histomorphometric (percentage of bone-to-implant contact [%BIC]) evaluation. Analysis of variance at the 95% confidence level and the Tukey post hoc test were used for multiple comparisons.

 

Results: SEMand AFM showed that surface microtextures were qualitatively and quantitatively different and that the BGB/AA surface presented higher submicrometer average roughness values (Ra) and root mean square (RMS) values compared to control surfaces. Ca and P were detected at theBGB/AA surface by APS. Higher degrees of bone organization were observed along the perimeter of the BGB/AA surface compared to control, despite the non-significant differences in %BIC between the surfaces (P >0.25). Significantly higher removal torque was observed for the BGB/AA implants at both time periods (P <0.0001).

 

Conclusion: According to the biomechanical and histomorphologic results, early biomechanical fixation was positively affected by the BGB/AA surface compared to the dual-acid etched surface.

Removal Torque and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bioceramic Grit-Blasted/Acid-Etched and Dual Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces: An Experimental Study in Dogs

 

 

J Periodontol 008;79:1942-1949. October 2008 Volume 79 • Number 10

Implant

Surface: 15

SUPPORTO
SERVIZIO CLIENTI
L-PRF™: INFORMAZIONI PER IL PAZIENTE
PRODOTTI: ISTRUZIONI D'USO
DRIVE-LOCK
CONFEZIONAMENTO
GUIDA DI TORQUE
VIDEO
ALTRI PRODOTTI
REOSS
BIOPAD
EXOMED
IMPLANT REMOVER
TORQUE LOCK
BONE PROFILER
KIT ABUTMENT TRY-IN
SOLUZIONI DIGITALI
NETWORK
DISTRIBUTORI
CORSI ED EVENTI
SEGUICI SU FACEBOOK 
SEGUICI SU YOUTUBE 
SEGUICI SU LINKEDIN 
AZIENDA
BIOMIMETIC
NEWS
CERTIFICAZIONI

Servizio Vendita: +39 089-233045

Lunedì - Venerdì, 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. |  ITALIA

Via Fabrizio Pinto, 16 * 84124 Salerno (SA) Italy

Area Riservata

©2016 Intra-Lock International       |   Made in the USA