Letteratura scientifica
Abstract
Background: Surface modifications to dental implants have been used in an attempt to accelerate the osseointegration process. The objective of this study was to biomechanically/histomorphometrically evaluate a bioceramic grit-blasted and acid-etched surface (BGB/AA;test) versus a dual acid-etched implant surface (control) in a beagle dog model.
Methods: Control and BGB/AA implants were subjected to a series of physicochemical characterization tools, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and auger photoelectron spectroscopy (APS). The animal model included the placement of 72 implants along the proximal tibiae of six beagle dogs, which remained in place for 2 or 4 weeks. After euthanization, half of the specimens were biomechanically tested (removal torque), and the other half was non-decalcified processed to slides of ;30 mm thickness for histomorphologic and histomorphometric (percentage of bone-to-implant contact [%BIC]) evaluation. Analysis of variance at the 95% confidence level and the Tukey post hoc test were used for multiple comparisons.
Results: SEMand AFM showed that surface microtextures were qualitatively and quantitatively different and that the BGB/AA surface presented higher submicrometer average roughness values (Ra) and root mean square (RMS) values compared to control surfaces. Ca and P were detected at theBGB/AA surface by APS. Higher degrees of bone organization were observed along the perimeter of the BGB/AA surface compared to control, despite the non-significant differences in %BIC between the surfaces (P >0.25). Significantly higher removal torque was observed for the BGB/AA implants at both time periods (P <0.0001).
Conclusion: According to the biomechanical and histomorphologic results, early biomechanical fixation was positively affected by the BGB/AA surface compared to the dual-acid etched surface.
Removal Torque and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bioceramic Grit-Blasted/Acid-Etched and Dual Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces: An Experimental Study in Dogs
Charles Marin*, Rodrigo Granato*, Marcelo Suzuki†, Jose N. Gil*, Adriano Piattelli‡, and Paulo G. Coelho§
* Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
† Department of Prosthodontics, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
‡ Department of Oral Sciences, University of Chieti–Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
§ Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY.
J Periodontol 008;79:1942-1949. October 2008 Volume 79 • Number 10
Implant
Surface: 15
Clicca su qualunque numero o articolo per visualizzare il suo abstract.
Rigenerazione Guidata Naturale | L-PRF™
Superficie Implantare | Ossean®
Connessione (Meccanica) Protesica | InDex™
Architettura Implantare | Blossom®
Impianti di diametro ridotto | MDL® and MILO®
Varie
MENU
Servizio Vendita: +39 089-233045
Lunedì - Venerdì, 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. | ITALIA
Via Ottavio Bottigliero, 1 - 84126 - Salerno (SA) - Italia
©2018 Intra-Lock International 
| Made in the USA 
Informativa Privacy | Informativa Cookies
|
Questo sito ha aggiornato la sua Informativa sulla privacy e sui cookies. Invitiamo tutti gli utenti a prenderne visione.
Ricordiamo agli utenti che questo sito utilizza cookies analitici, per poterti offrire una maggiore semplicità nell'utilizzo. La prosecuzione della navigazione mediante accesso ad altra area del sito o selezione di un elemento dello stesso comporta la prestazione del consenso all'uso dei cookies.
|
